Table of Contents[Hide][Show]
- What are Microservices?
- What is a Serverless model?
Architectural designs in the past were often monolithic and lacked management, scalability, and agility. In this situation, the businesses would need to deploy the complete program to a solitary application server operating on a solitary computer.
Sometimes the entire database might even be installed on the same system. Even after performing all of this, a problem would simply cause the program to shut down, interrupting all activities.
The result was a never-ending cycle of coding, deployment, and troubleshooting that decreased the productivity of the businesses.
But when architectural ideas changed, the industry saw a dramatic upheaval that gave rise to the two main architectures known as serverless and microservices. Both have a strong case to be used in scalable and agile systems.
Both prioritize security, but they take different approaches. Owners of businesses regularly question whether or not they are the same.
Which one should be picked if they are different to get even more amazing benefits? This article will help us find out.
What are Microservices?
The architectural design pattern known as microservices divides a larger application into a number of smaller ones, thus the name. The monolithic design, in which all functionality is contained in a single unit, is completely opposed to this.
Let’s use an example of an application for online shopping to help our comprehension. After finding the item(s) they want, the consumer adds them to their shopping cart and places their order.
Application Programming Interfaces (APIs) connect several services that operate independently from one another (API). Microservices provide features such as a shopping cart, checkout process, and product.
The implementation of microservices can be done in a variety of methods. Each microservice has the fundamental components it needs to function independently, including its own database, libraries, and templates.
It essentially adheres to the SOA (Service Oriented Architecture) principles, which provide the user the power to build new applications and execute different apps independently.
DevOps separates all of the application’s features into smaller apps or services that can operate on their own while still functioning as the application as a whole. Before being deployed, each of these microservice apps is created and functionally tested.
What is a Serverless model?
In a serverless paradigm, the external cloud service provider is in charge of managing the server. Developers just need to worry about the code; the service provider will take care of security updates, load balancing, capacity management, scalability, logging, and monitoring.
The entire application can be run using serverless architecture, or only a subset of it. As soon as the app’s code is run, the server allocates resources to it and releases them once the app is no longer in use, thus it is only required when the app is actively being used.
The app owner is only charged during the time that the app is in use. Cloud service companies provide Backend-as-a-Service (BaaS) and Function-as-a-Service (FaaS).
BaaS offers pre-built features so the developer just needs to concentrate on the front-end. It is rarely used due to the limited customizability and control it offers.
FaaS, however, is more flexible since developers can create both the front and back ends while still executing the application on a distant server. With FaaS, an application can be created as a collection of functions.
Every function has a purpose and an initiating factor. The function cannot operate continuously; it is normally temporary and is terminated as soon as it is no longer needed.
Serverless Vs Microservices
A decentralized program that was split up into several smaller components, also known as services, is referred to as a microservice architecture. They are all accountable for ensuring that one specific task is carried out to perfection.
Microservices are very specialized and can only do one thing flawlessly. Each architecture has a different strategy for resolving issues. Long-term fixes are available with microservices.
Each service can function continuously and 24/7. It’s an excellent long-term answer for teams that are scaling.
On the other side, serverless apps’ features are focused on improving code efficiency. Functions don’t last as long as microservices do. They only begin to operate in response to a certain input or situation.
Because serverless architecture is event-driven, a function won’t run if there isn’t a trigger. The program doesn’t use more CPU than necessary, and teams can save money on computing and storage space thanks to this effective development methodology.
Aside from these basic variations, the two designs also differ in other ways.
Let’s focus on a few key considerations while deciding whether to use microservices or serverless computing.
Functions are transitory and only execute when a certain situation calls for them. They are more compact and slimmer.
A microservice can manage several linked operations at once whereas a function is solely responsible for one activity.
A single microservice can perform several functions.
Functions that are serverless have a short runtime. How much a certain function can run varies depending on the supplier.
For instance, a function can run on AWS Lambda for 15 minutes. This is due to the fact that functions are, by nature, brief procedures that shouldn’t consume much RAM.
Vendor specifications for runtime, storage, and RAM are not a restriction for microservices. Because of this, they are more suitable for intricate, long-term activities that require storing and processing massive volumes of data.
The creation of team resources is necessary for microservices. The tasks of monitoring, deployment, support, and maintenance are carried out by an internal or external team. The team is totally in charge of supporting the architecture, handling its computing, and ensuring its safety.
Contrarily, serverless architecture depends on a third-party supplier. The business is not required to create, protect, and manage its own server space. All internal functions are handled by the cloud provider.
This strategy can decrease project costs while avoiding recruiting and onboarding fees, storage charges, and hardware purchases.
The initial cost of creating microservices is higher. To complete the project, several teams are required, and it takes time and careful preparation to establish the relationships between the various components.
Microservices’ creation and upkeep are more expensive as a result of their reliance on internal resources and assistance.
However, there are benefits to this strategy. The business does not rely on outside plans and does not run the danger of vendor lock-in.
The ability to cut expenses is the primary competitive advantage of serverless architecture. Businesses that employ serverless architecture gain from pooling resources.
Because they share their servers among several customers, third-party providers can offer lower subscription prices.
Additionally, you are saving on HR costs because you do not need to recruit hardware and server expertise.
When Should You Use Microservices vs. Serverless Architecture
Microservices Are The Best Option If Confidentiality Is Your Top Priority
Serverless architecture services might not be the ideal choice if you’re exchanging information. The application may have some serious problems.
A form of managed or shared hosting is cloud hosting.
You will therefore be able to observe that you are not the only person using a third-party vendor’s resources. Because this circumstance involves “multi-tenants” as opposed to “single-tenants,” your data is not completely protected in this case.
The information and data belonging to another tenant are visible to and accessible to one tenant. In addition, it is unlikely that you would continually consume resources from a single supplier. There may be a large number.
The ability to monitor and configure the entire process will thus get harder as the vendor changes.
Utilize microservices if you want your legacy to endure.
Serverless architecture services won’t work if the old system’s infrastructure needs to be in place for the time being.
Speed and cost are two aspects of serverless architecture that perform well, but they are not the only ones.
Although serverless is quite granular, it is incompatible with a sizable, existing codebase because of this granularity.
In other words, it is too large of a leap to make once you have a legacy system. Therefore, it is preferable to choose a Microservices strategy.
If you are a startup, choosing serverless is the way to go.
The best choice for serverless architecture is if you are the startup’s founder. The serverless architecture will provide you with the quickest and fastest time-to-market speeds, regardless of your objective—responding to a time-limited market or immediately grabbing a market share at the outset of any trend.
Additionally, it will be an affordable option for entrepreneurs. A server that is not in use won’t cost you anything. In the lack of reliable use statistics, you often need apps that are extremely adaptable.
Serverless and Microservices Should Be Used If You Are Starting From Scratch
Making a fresh start enables you to get the benefits of Serverless Architecture Providers more quickly, but not right away. Use Microservices when designing a brand-new architecture but anticipate switching to Serverless later.
Serverless vs. Microservices Architecture: Pros and Cons
Unfortunately, no technology is perfect; if it were, the world would already be a contented, highly developed place.
Each technology includes benefits you can use for your project as well as drawbacks you must be prepared to live with. Let’s examine both now.
Pros of Microservices
- Simpler scaling: Since the services are separate, it is possible to add or delete functions and scale things with the least amount of work. As opposed to monolithic programs, you do not have to consider the complete code base.
- Better software resilience: Because microservices are less dependent on one another, the failure of one does not bring down the whole application. It is especially helpful when traffic is heavy.
- Different platforms: You can link microservices located on several platforms, in addition to doing so with languages. A portion of an application can also be hosted normally and serverless.
- Team autonomy: Multiple small teams can interact and work on the project simultaneously
- Multilingual: An API allows you to link microservices written in several languages. It is a helpful advantage because various technologies more effectively meet the various demands of a feature. However, using too many languages can result in difficulties linking everything, therefore it is preferable to keep things simple.
- Space for experiments: Despite our wealth of data, our assumptions are sometimes incorrect, and microservices enable you to test everything. Since apps with microservices are incredibly adaptable, as we have previously discussed, there is no need to spend thousands of dollars merely to add a new feature that you might wish to eliminate later.
Cons of Microservices
- Security issues: You must monitor your APIs closely because they are frequently incorrectly set up and hence susceptible.
- Connection challenges: You must carefully design how to link all microservices and move data from one location to another.
- Debugging is challenging since you have to examine each microservice’s logs.
- Difficult testing: you must test each microservice separately before evaluating the connection on a global scale.
Pros of Serverless
- Effortless scaling: the server automatically adjusts up or down.
- Very rapid deployment: you can quickly design new features and test your ideas.
- Server administration is not your concern: you can concentrate on the application rather than the server.
- Pay-as-you-go: You just pay for the capacity of the server that you use; there is no need to pay for inactive time.
Cons of Serverless
- Difficult testing: Even though you can’t fully reproduce the serverless environment, it’s difficult to understand how the code will operate after it’s deployed.
- Low flexibility: Many individuals have trouble committing to a single serverless environment provider for an extended period.
- Cold start: It remains cached, but only briefly, once each function is complete. The function will need to respond to the invocation request again, which takes time if you start it up again and it is not cached.
Serverless and microservices are architecturally related technologies that use various techniques. Both serverless and microservices emphasize scalability, adaptability, cost-effectiveness, and simplicity of adding new features as opposed to monolithic design.
Since each service functions as an independent application, long-term scalability is the main goal of microservices.
Depending on the product scope and priorities of the organization, one might select between the two strategies.
Microservices will give you serverless microservices for long-term solutions if you intend to construct a big platform that needs ongoing growth.
Serverless architecture is a fantastic option if you want to deploy quickly and affordably.